Setfenv

If I'm 12 then, "that moment when a 12 year old roasts you", FeelsRoastedMan. You should honestly work on your insulting skills, you're lacking the comebacks. People like you disgust me, getting high off of insulting other people. Is this why you haven't achieved a single thing in life besides getting high rated on PandaWoW? What's it like? I want to know.

rofl shut the fuck up omg, nobody likes you, all you do is shittalk people because you're too insecure about yourself, grow up ps. your english is some of the worst I've seen, not sure why you're even writing

Warriors, sure, not warlocks, and maybe mages a tiny bit. Not sure what the problem is with warlocks.

Potato

Is this top DPS pure burst/consistent pressure/or overall? Like, wars by far overall but I guess destro/arcane mage could 100-0 someone if done correctly but it's not that easy to get off.

Looks really well done, pretty impressive. Looking forward to it! When do you think it's coming out? Also, doesn't noneed play mage as well? Would love to see some mage clips in there.

It's typical how ignorant you are about this situation, kind of a meme at this point. If these "rank 1 players" all queue 3s, why is rank 1 in 3s 2.4k meanwhile rank 1 in 2s is like 3.1k? Hello, where's the logic there? If every single person above 2.4k mmr in 2s queued 3s, do you realize how many more queues in 3s we would get? And do you realize that the rating would skyrocket just because of this? I once played 3s all day for 3 days in a row. You want to know the players I fought? Randoms from x100 and then Repitch, those were the only teams in queue, absolutely nothing else. So stop pretending like every player on pwow is spam queueing 3s all day, it just doesn't happen. If that were true, your druid would be much higher rated than 2.4. Furthermore, once again, since you're not smart enough to understand what I'm saying, I'll try to simplify it. 1. Unless you're 2.8k+, you won't ever get a 2s title. 2. Which means: Only the highest rated players will even notice that the titles are gone. 3. Which means: All of the highest rated players will be queueing 3s for their rewards. 4. Which means: High rated players are queueing 3s while the 0-2.799 cr players will be queueing 2s. 5. Which in turn makes for more frequent queues. This isn't designed to get every single player on pwow to queue 3s, get your fucking head together before you think that. I've stated it numerous times but I guess English is too tough for you to read. Stop acting like you're some god who everybody should listen to. I've met maybe 3 total people on pwow that actually like you, the rest think you're a fucking dick. You insult others for your own personal gain only because you're high rated on a private server. You have this childish superiority complex coupled with HUGE narcissistic personality disorder. I'm not going to go into detail because I don't know who you are, but you really need to grow up one of these days. PS. You just said AT failed when they removed perma-titles from 2s, yet you're saying I'm wrong?

lol, you're the only one so far that doesn't understand what I'm saying, stop pretending like you're some God who everyone should listen to. And plus, I only queue 3s on pandawow, I haven't queued 2s past 2k mmr since RM with Snaregodqt. How many casuals do you know have beaten a 2.8 cr KFC in 3s with a trash mage? Get your facts straight, kid, or get off of my forum thread. Anyway, disregarding the trolls, I still think we should try just only having 3v3 titles and see what happens. PS: Of course 2s is the most active bracket here, it's the most active bracket everywhere. Doesn't mean getting rid of titles will change that. For the 90000000th time, casuals = people that are under 2.8k, aka, 90% of this server, which means they'll never even get close to getting Challenger, let alone glad. Therefore, they won't even notice that titles were removed. Stop complaining because you're not smart enough to understand what I'm saying. Btw, kindly refrain from disrespecting me when you barely understand a single line of my posts, it doesn't look too good on you.

I just explained to you exactly why it wouldn't with two perfectly acceptable reasons, I don't know why you don't understand this. 1. Casuals play 2s, not 3s. Even on retail. This means that people that aren't going for extremely high rating and hardcore gameplay will completely disregard 3v3 and play 2v2. As in: 90% of this entire server.... 2. Casuals would never get a title in 2s anyway. This means that Unless you're 2800+, you will never even scratch the surface of having even Challenger, so what's the point in having 2v2 titles when all of the players that are good enough to obtain these titles will be playing 3v3? Seems kind of pointless.... Keeping titles in 2v2 will completely waste having permanent titles in 3v3. As I explained like 9 times on this one forum thread. I, myself, if I was a rank 1 player, I wouldn't waste my time spending maybe 3 times as much effort getting rank 1 in 3s(Which I might not get anyway) when I could play maybe half of the time, easier comps, etc, and get a temporary title but get the same title every season(gladiator for example). It's just not worth a permanent title given how much more difficult it is to get 3v3 rating. TL;DR The incentive here is to get high rated players that only play 2s because it's convenient and less time-consuming to have the motivation to queue 3s. Taking away 1 title won't make a difference.

Can you link post where he said it plz

K, to finalize this post for Zeox: 1. Removing titles in 2s will not kill the bracket a. Reason 1: Casuals play 2s, they don't play 3s. Even on retail. This server is 90% casuals. b. Reason 2: Casuals would have no chance of EVER getting a title anyway, that's not their goal when coming here. 2. Keeping titles in 2s but only temp titles won't make a difference. a. Reason 1: I don't know about you, but it seems to me that it's much harder to get rating in 3s than it is in 2s(3 members, less queues, etc.) so why waste the time trying to get a permanent title rather than get a temp title. b. Reason 2: I'd rather spend my time getting the same temp title every season(Gladiator) in 2s than trying much much harder to get a permanent title in 3s(Vicious Gladiator for example). 3. Making 3v3 only titles will bring back members who have left pandawow. a. Reason: I, for one, don't play this server much anymore but if 3s mattered then I would. I am living evidence. 4. Originality: The only private server that has 3v3 only rewards. a. Discussion: I don't know about you, but other than Firestorm(that's dead and almost going down), I can't think of any other servers in WoW history(besides retail) that had 3v3 only rewards. Now I'm probably wrong and someone can shine more light on this, but it'll still get the attention of other server players that enjoy 3v3 but are playing in dead brackets to come here. Thus, populating the server and having an original aspect to it. In conclusion: This is not designed to get every single player on pwow to queue 3v3! The only reason this is being done is to get rank 1 players that are already high rated in 2s to queue 3s.

#Repitch4Pres

^This

Meh, maybe for that particular season but there weren't any hunters at that Blizzcon for either side so it's perfectly fine mentioning them both.

Yeah definitely, I'm just surprised not a SINGLE hunter on US played Survival beyond 2.8 when there's tons of Survival's on EU with 3k+.

Yeah, I guess in comps like hunter/healer a rot comp is much better(at least on pwow, not sure about retail) but I mean if you look at the US ladders at October 13th, 2014, every hunter was MM. Tony, Tosan, Glinks, Dilly, Dhorothy, etc. Evidence: http://web.archive.org/web/20141013101831/http://us.battle.net/wow/en/pvp/leaderboards/3v3 Every single hunter on the first page was MM. But, like Noneed said, Survival was pretty prevalent on EU http://web.archive.org/web/20140920190646/http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/pvp/leaderboards/3v3. Not sure why this is but I thought it was interesting.

Idk, I really don't see evidence to support Survival being any better than MM outside of dot-pressure comps like HLS. MM has way too many utilities and such easy but powerful burst potential meanwhile Survival takes a lot more to actually get pressure out.

Yeah but I just feel like there's so many flaws to Survival that aren't present in MM. For example, it doesn't take 5 buttons to put out maximum pressure as an MM hunter(arcane shot and steady shot with occasional aimed shot and chimera), while it takes Black Arrow(dispellable), Serpent Sting, Explosive Shot, Arcane Shot, and Cobra Shot just to put out pressure. Meanwhile a good healer will spam dispel Black Arrow(which doesn't do much but is still annoying as a hunter) while no healer even thinks about serpent sting from MM. Plus, you have a blanket silence as MM, and everything else is the same. It just seems like MM should be much better than Survival but I guess if Survival is easier than go 4 it.

Just wondering. MM was miles better than Survival back on retail(maybe not miles, but it was technically better), why does every hunter here play Survival? Is it Explosive Shot dps? Constant Pressure? Etc.? Just wondering, thanks.

No fixes to leap yet....

Having the same problem. Hoping for a fix soon. Try running as Administrator.

@Autsch, nobody loves you, m8. http://imgur.com/a/C2lEi I challenge Snaregodqt, Repitchx's Mom, noneed's imaginary gf

*Thinks about returning to PandaWoW* *Checks forums to see if there's anything new to look forward to* *Sees the same tryhards arguing from before* [ATTACH=CONFIG]120832[/ATTACH]

I actually get about 130 ms in the US. Not sure how people are getting 200+ anywhere.

But this still doesn't give anyone the incentive to queue 3s. Let's say they were to implement this, here's the problem. It's 10x easier to get the glad title in 2s than it is to get the r1 title in 3s. Therefore, why would I waste my time queueing 3s all day just to get a permanent title when I can get the same title every season in 2s without about a third of the queue times. I'd have to worry about finding 2 players for 3s, I'd have to worry about the 3s bracket actually having people play on it, etc. 3s is a much more difficult bracket to get into than 2s because much more players queue 2s than 3s. But, this is pretty similar on retail. Not many casuals play 3s at above 1550 mmr, they play it for fun. Just like in 2s for pwow, they're probably at 2k max, then they play different stuff or sit the same rating no matter their win/loss. So, what you'd find is that you'd have to put in a lot more work and time in order to get just one extra title than you would in 2s which takes much less work. If I, myself, was at Aku's level and got rank 1 every season in 2s, I wouldn't waste my time trying to get 3s sessions going just for one extra title every season. This is just my opinion, any and all opinions are welcome, but yeah. - - - Updated - - - Also, my idea is mainly to get the hardcore players that actually care about titles to play 3v3. I don't want to fight pugs all day, you know. If every rank 1 2v2 player switched over to 3v3 and did 2s more casually, it would be a stronger bracket. Getting even just Challenger in 2s is still like 2.7-2.8k cr, only the absolute hardcore players will even get close to getting that. So, all of the randoms that come here won't ever have a chance of even getting Challenger. But, that won't stop them from still queueing 2s. People still queue 2s on retail, doesn't mean they get anything out of it. Even the rank 1 players queue 2s. But, they pay more attention and spend more time on 3s because they have that incentive of showing off their titles to their friends and enemies. Thus, removing 2s titles would keep the regulars queueing 2s while the hardcore's queue 3s. - - - Updated - - - PS. @aku, Firestorm was booming right as the season started. I don't know what caused them to die now, but several people I talked to said that queue sessions in 3s were hyped right after they made the change.