Jump to content

Rain of Fire ticks

Furmetal

By Furmetal
in Declined topics

Recommended Posts

Furmetal Wanderer

Furmetal

Posted
Posted

Realm tested - Fun

 

Spell - Rain of Fire

 

Date tested - 01/11/2015

 

Description - If you place multiple rains of fire in a target, all rains' damage will be dealt.

 

How it should work - Only one rain of fire should tick, no matter how many you place on a target.

 

Priority - 8/10, makes it really overpower specially now with crossrealm battlegrounds, people choose Mannoroth's Fury and spam Rain of Fire with full procs in the newbies and undergeared, dealing 18k+ damage per tick(and they tick really fast since there are multiple placed), not mentioning its use in arenas.

 

Comments - On the proofs, please disregard my graphics custom.

 

Proofs

(look at combat log)

(look at combat log)

Discussion

  • Like 2
Noneedholy Enthusiast

Noneedholy

Posted
Posted (edited)

furmetal can you please do something useful and report this FUCKING explosive shot ? this cancer fuck is annoying.

Fucking rand hunters who backpaddle and still oneshot you with a 130k explosive in deffstance as war YO

 

talking about the stacking bug btw.

Edited by Noneedholy
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)

http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire, http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath

 

I don't see anywhere "official info" saying that works how u mean.. even more, your argument of how it should work is based in a comment from a random guy in a forum.. Rain of Fire is thought to work like that because Destruction warlock have this pasive http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath which alow destro warlock to do that, to hit with more than 1 rain to 1 target because there is no need to cast it, ur argument just does not hold, its just how u want it to work, not how it work..

 

Search for official blizzard message saying the mechanic u explain, not a discussion in a forum made by players..

Edited by pujo2
Nemifest Collaborator

Nemifest

Posted
Posted (edited)
http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire, http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath

 

I don't see anywhere "official info" saying that works how u mean.. even more, your argument of how it should work is based in a comment from a random guy in a forum.. Rain of Fire is thought to work like that because Destruction warlock have this pasive http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath which alow destro warlock to do that, to hit with more than 1 rain to 1 target because there is no need to cast it, ur argument just does not hold, its just how u want it to work, not how it work..

 

Search for official blizzard message saying the mechanic u explain, not a discussion in a forum made by players..

 

What does http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath Have to do with RoF stacking in dmg? If you disagree with us, then prove us wrong.

 

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/10949905137 3rd Comment

 

only one rain of fire ticks on the target, no matter how many you drop on them. also, it only does respectable damage when your target is immolated and in single target fights it really is a waste of 1/4 of your mana pool.
Edited by Nemifest
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
What does http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath Have to do with RoF stacking in dmg? If you disagree with us, then prove us wrong.

 

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/10949905137 3rd Comment

 

 

Your arguments are based in a forum discusion made by players, not by blizzard. My arguments are that there is no where an oficial mechanic info made by blizzard saying that it should work how u mean, i searched for what u say about mechanic and no where says that..

 

And warlock have http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath just to be able to do more than 1 rain in the same target besides the big cost of mana..

 

If i go on oficial forum and say that warriors should do 400k then u will post it here saying that warrior should hit 400k?? NO, its just stupid, blizzard have to say it, not the players opinion..

Edited by pujo2
Nemifest Collaborator

Nemifest

Posted
Posted (edited)
Your arguments are based in a forum discusion made by players, 0 oficial message about what u mean. My arguments are that there is no where an oficial mechanic info made by blizzard saying that it should work how u mean, i searched for what u say about mechanic and no where says that..

 

And warlock have http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath just to be able to do more than 1 rain besides the big cost of mana..

 

Your comment is constantly useless.

 

Haven't you figured out why you're being reported for Rain of Fire?

 

The stack damage of Rain Of Fire gets bugged and ticks too many times, if you're saying that THIS is wrong. Prove us wrong, or stop trying to protect a gamebreaking bug.

 

Blizzard will not consider buffing Warrior's doing 400k DMG, which is ridiculously high. Just prove us wrong that this formula and FIX is wrong, else stop being useless and protecting the only spell that provides DISADVANTAGE

 

The only reason why RoF is useful in PvP:

 

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/12318921839

 

2.4:

Rain of fire will also generate embers but not nearly as efficient as your other spells unless its hitting 3-4+ targets

 

Rain of fire can be used when hunters pop stampede, or its going to hit many targets as it helps build embers quite nicely
Edited by Nemifest
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)

Again a player opinion comment on forum, not from blizzard..

 

http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire, http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath

 

I don't see anywhere "official info" saying that works how u mean.. even more, your argument of how it should work is based in a comment from a random guy in a forum.. Rain of Fire is thought to work like that because Destruction warlock have this pasive http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath which alow destro warlock to do that, to hit with more than 1 rain to 1 target because there is no need to cast it, ur argument just does not hold, its just how u want it to work, not how it work..

 

Search for official blizzard message saying the mechanic u explain, not a discussion in a forum made by players..

 

 

As i said, players opinion http://prntscr.com/8y9mof, dumb opinions, there are other ways to play.. if u believe what someone say in a forum without being from blizzard u just stupid. People can say what they want, its a opinion.

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

The stack damage of Rain Of Fire gets bugged and ticks too many times' date=' if you're saying that THIS is wrong. Prove us wrong, or stop trying to protect a gamebreaking bug.[/quote']

 

This don't work like that, the ticks are the same as 1 rain but if u use more rains u do more ticks obvoiusly.. thats why http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath ..

Edited by pujo2
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
else stop being useless and protecting the only spell that provides DISADVANTAGE

 

Don't make disadvantage if u go like http://prntscr.com/8y9mof ...

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Then I guess by your logic no one should take you seriously. Nothing you say is from Blizzard either.

 

 

 

http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire , http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath ,im not bassed in player comments on forum.. im based in spells description.

Edited by pujo2
Noneedholy Enthusiast

Noneedholy

Posted
Posted (edited)
This don't work like that' date=' the ticks are the same as 1 rain but if u use more rains u do more ticks obvoiusly.. thats why Aftermath[/quote']

Idiot, rain of fire should obviously not stack HAHAHAHAHAHA

 

thats why Aftermath

No, you choose that talent that you can cast that shit and do something else at the same time. Attacking someone or w/e i don't really need to explain that since everyone knows how it should work and ur just defending a stupid bug xD

Edited by Noneedholy
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
Idiot, rain of fire should obviously not stack HAHAHAHAHAHA

 

 

No, you choose that talent that you can cast that shit and do something else at the same time. Attacking someone or w/e i don't really need to explain that since everyone knows how it should work and ur just defending a stupid bug xD

 

0 arguments lol u just spam, with or without Mannoroth the rain do the same mechanic.. everyone knows? show me where it says that works how u say by blizzard, i link spells, u just talk and act like a kid.

Edited by pujo2
Nemifest Collaborator

Nemifest

Posted
Posted
show me where it says that works how u say by blizzard, i link spells, u just talk and act like a kid.

 

SHOW us where in RETAIL the damage stacks. And we'll consider your ridiculous logic.

Saylance Rookie

Saylance

Posted
Posted (edited)

pujo2, Bug is present. Rain can stuck in one target more then once.

How it must work:

If you put Rain in same place twice, you just renew it.

 

Becouse now, you can stuck it -> infinity time in same place.

Edited by Saylance
Nemifest Collaborator

Nemifest

Posted
Posted

Rain Of Fire CANNOT stack in damage.

 

As for an example: If you cast RoF twice on 1 players, the RoF does NOT stack it doesn't do 2x different dmg. The latest RoF casted on the exact place just renews the old RoF.

 

Prove us wrong, else stop being useless.

pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted
Rain Of Fire CANNOT stack in damage.

 

As for an example: If you cast RoF twice on 1 players, the RoF does NOT stack it doesn't do 2x different dmg. The latest RoF casted on the exact place just renews the old RoF.

 

Prove us wrong, else stop being useless.

 

 

U are the ones doing the post, u have to prove what u saying, u all just talk and 0 proofs of what u saying, i already linked the spells with their description..

pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire, http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath

 

I don't see anywhere "official info" saying that works how u mean.. even more, your argument of how it should work is based in a comment from a random guy in a forum.. Rain of Fire is thought to work like that because Destruction warlock have this pasive http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath which alow destro warlock to do that, to hit with more than 1 rain to 1 target because there is no need to cast it, ur argument just does not hold, its just how u want it to work, not how it work..

 

Search for official blizzard message saying the mechanic u explain, not a discussion in a forum made by players..

 

 

Nothing more to say, most of u make stupid 12 years old complains and 0 arguments.

Edited by pujo2
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
Nothing more to say, most of u make stupid 12 years old complains and 0 arguments.

 

 

http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire , http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath

 

I don't see anywhere "official info" saying that works how u mean.. even more, your argument of how it should work is based in a comment from a random guy in a forum.. Rain of Fire is thought to work like that because Destruction warlock have this pasive Aftermath which alow destro warlock to do that, to hit with more than 1 rain to 1 target because there is no need to cast it, ur argument just does not hold, its just how u want it to work, not how it work..

 

Search for official blizzard message saying the mechanic u explain, not a discussion in a forum made by players..

 

.....

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Is the only argument based in something on all this topic.

 

Now u are alowed to shut up http://z0r.de/3068

Edited by pujo2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...