buff stacking

[pujo2]

1. Any buff

2. For example when someone buff stamina, i lose my own warlock stamina buff, is just stupid i lose the 10% magic dmg because a war buff stamina or a priest??

3. Own buffs should never disapear if another guy buff the same effect. The effect should not stack but i should not lose my own buffs.

4. 29-october-2015

5. Realm fun

6. 4/10*

7. proff: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ial26IDXbpk

 

 

http://forum.pandawow.ru/showthread....t=warlock+buff

 

The buff stack is fixed, but now the problem is that if u have warlock buff, and then anyone buff a different stamina buff, all raid lose the 10% spel power from warlock buff, its so anoying.

 

Also if someone buff a 8% stamina buff from inscription, all raid lose the 10% stamina buffs, i think that the buffs should stack, but not his effect, for example: if there is a priest, a walrock, and a war on bg, and the 3 buff 10% stamina, just one 10% stamina should be applied and one 10% spel power from warlock buff, beside removing it like is doing now.

 

(sorry for weird explanation, in the video is so clear)

Edited December 2, 2015 by pujo2

[pujo2]

200% anoying D: Edited December 1, 2015 by pujo2

[Frostshotz]

It's working the proper way, and as a lock you should always keep your buff up.Seriously, that hard to press a button more than one time?

[Nemifest]

Currently, shaman's mastery buff is bugged.

 

Doesn't give the buff correctly.

[pujo2]

It's working the proper way, and as a lock you should always keep your buff up.Seriously, that hard to press a button more than one time?

 

dud, this is so anoying, all buffs should stack but just 1 effect of each tipe should work on a player (one of stats, one of stamina, one of mastery, etc), then u could have 3 stamina buffs but just one 10% effect work, then it wouldn't be problems like that i think

Edited December 1, 2015 by pujo2

[Frostshotz]

dud, this is so anoying, all buffs should stack but just 1 effect of each tipe should work on a player (one of stats, one of stamina, one of mastery, etc), then u could have 3 stamina buffs but just one 10% effect work, then it wouldn't be problems like that i think

I meant to say that the 10% sp should be retained, my bad.

[Noneedholy]

10/10

roflmao

 

i lose my own warlock stamina buff' date='[/quote']

rebuffing... ik its hard bro

 

Also on retail for example when you buffed Stamina as warrior and the priest did it right after, your stamina buff dissappeared. Its working as intended and stop giving stupid reports like that 10/10 lmfao

[pujo2]

roflmao

 

 

rebuffing... ik its hard bro

 

Also on retail for example when you buffed Stamina as warrior and the priest did it right after, your stamina buff dissappeared. Its working as intended and stop giving stupid reports like that 10/10 lmfao

 

Pandawow is not retail, if u want all like retail go play retail and stop getting mad.. if there is a problem that anoy like this, devs are able to find a way to solve it, just because all will be better by solving these tipe of problems.

 

Getting 2 or more buffs with the same effect but just 1 effect of each tipe working on a player (one of stats, one of stamina, one of mastery, etc), then u could have 3 stamina buffs but just one 10% effect work, or 3 stats buffs but just one 5% increase working, would be a good way to solve the problem.

[Nemifest]

Pandawow is not retail, if u want all like retail go play retail and stop getting mad.. if there is a problem that anoy like this, devs are able to find a way to solve it, just because all will be better by solving these tipe of problems

 

Private Server's dedicated from Retail ( Blizzard World Of Warcraft )

 

There's 2 types of Private Server's;

Blizzlike

Funlike ( God-like / Custom )

[pujo2]

But retail is not perfect, if there are ways to solve any anoying problem, private servers can work for be better than retail in that way, don't u think?, like the idea of cross factions bgs that i saw in other servers, wich helped alot with bg calls, people got so happy with this tipe of cool ideas to solve problems that players have in game, is like the Fun realm here, with the basic pvp set npc's that u can buy for gold (having 0 problems with gold in game that is so good too), gems and enchants, all at stormwind, is a cool idea that make the game funnier for people, or the Teleporter npc (idk if exist in retail, but is a very good idea to go fast to diferents points of the world), or the instant Fly npc, i think in retail u have to wait until all the jurney its done, no? (im not sure)

 

These tipe of cool ideas i mean.

Edited December 2, 2015 by pujo2

[Nemifest]

But retail is not perfect, if there are ways to solve any anoying problem, private servers can work for be better than retail in that way, don't u think?, like the idea of cross factions bgs that i saw in other servers, wich helped alot with bg calls, people got so happy with this tipe of cool ideas to solve problems that players have in game, is like the Fun realm here, with the basic pvp set npc's that u can buy for gold (having 0 problems with gold in game that is so good too), gems and enchants, all at stormwind, is a cool idea that make the game funnier for people.

 

Pandawow is based on Retail's fixes.

 

Retails fixes/work is better than custom fixes. Which brings A LOT unbalances.

 

E.G; Cross faction BG. It will bring bugs, because of racial spells / faction reputation / faction mounts. Cross faction BG is mostly "non-bugged" in 3.3.5 because there's not that much affected.

 

For my opinion, fun realm is enough custom. Leave it like that, and let your exaggerated "fix" away. 99% of the server will disagree with your "fix" the 1 percent is people like you.

[pujo2]

Currently, shaman's mastery buff is bugged.

 

Doesn't give the buff correctly.

 

If someone buff mastery and u lose the buff, then cham buff don't work i think.

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

For my opinion, fun realm is enough custom. Leave it like that, and let your exaggerated "fix" away. 99% of the server will disagree with your "fix" the 1 percent is people like you.

 

You don't know.

 

I just see the same guys in forum always. When i ask in game to someone if he/she look at the forum, the answer use to be that they don't check never the forum.

 

And the buff "fix" that i ment was working before the last buff changes, u could had all the stamina buffs but just 1 was beeing applyed, so was better than now i think, when im on bg fighting any priest or war can buff stamina because he want and all raid lose spel power without notice.. the best buff should prevale.. For example, now, if someone use 8% stamina buff, all raid lose the 10% stamina buff, this is good also?

[Nemifest]

If someone buff mastery and u lose the buff, then cham buff don't work i think.

 

Yes, kinda.

Let me explain.

 

I'am a shaman=3k Mastery/10% and I got in party with a paladin, then he use his buff ( 3k Mastery/10% ) And I don't get the 3k/10% mastery buff from the paladin.

 

Even though I have the 3k/10% mastery buff from the paladin, if I remove the paladin's buff, my mastery gets reduced by 10% which DECRESES my dmg than static.

 

E.G; I have 69% mastery. The paladin buffs me with mastery= 3k/10% I get the buff, but doesn't increase my mastery. Then if I remove the paladin's buff. My mastery gets reduced by 10% resulting into 59% mastery than normal.

Edited December 2, 2015 by Nemifest

[Noneedholy]

Pandawow is not retail' date=' if u want all like retail go play retail and stop getting mad.. if there is a problem that anoy like this, devs are able to find a way to solve it, just because all will be better by solving these tipe of problems.[/quote']

and pandawow will NEVER nerf etc. something they fix it like retail

scum.

ye i do play retail, that's why i've so much fun to shit on player like you ;)

[Adlairo]

l2 rebuff noob

[pujo2]

l2 rebuff noob

 

and pandawow will NEVER nerf etc. something they fix it like retail

scum.

ye i do play retail, that's why i've so much fun to shit on player like you ;)

 

Its so funny to see people with mental problems using a computer