faina Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 Боже' date=' сколько можно писать ложные репорты, при этом ни имея никакого знания класса и умения вычислять что-либо, самому-то не смешно? Небось сам не играл в s15, судя по написанному бреду ТСа, тот же Blaston приводил пример того, что домаг у варов на Pandaшош соответствует домагу в S15.[/quote'] уходи
Garodar Posted June 4, 2016 Author Posted June 4, 2016 Wish I understood russian to know what they're talking about.
Wexewellencexx Posted June 20, 2016 Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) First of all, read http://wow.gamepedia.com/Normalization http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=1464/slam already affected by http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=12712/seasoned-soldier (look at stats, weapon damage) 2,75*weapon damage+3427 Same formula in PvP. but you have to multiply that shit (2,75*weapon damage+3427) by PvP-power (2,75*weapon damage+3427)*1,N by PvP-resilience (2,75*weapon damage+3427)*1,N*0,2(default with 2 pvp trinkets) and by the target's armor (2,75*weapon damage+3427)*1,N*0,2*(1,00-0,N1) http://s009.radikal.ru/i309/1606/0a/e408bb99abef.jpg I have 10847 least weapon damage and 10872 maximum weapon damage. From this it follows: Least damage will be = 2,75 × 10847 + 3427 = 33256,25 Maximum damage will be = 2,75 × 10872 + 3427 = 33325 http://s017.radikal.ru/i414/1606/65/8b1b13aa5fbc.jpg Real least damage = 31382 Real maximum damage = 31421 Probaly this is due wowhead's formula: 2,75*weapon damage+1246(we have 3427) From this it follows: Least damage = 2,75 × 10847 + 1246 = 31075,25 Maximum damage = 2,75 × 10872 + 1246 = 31144 It's not critical. Tester can close it (3427 − 1246) × 0,2 × 1,6 = 697,92 in PVP and it was counted without enemy armor, but without colossus smash too Edited June 20, 2016 by Wexewellencexx
Frostshotz Posted June 20, 2016 Posted June 20, 2016 Wish I understood russian to know what they're talking about. lazy to translate the entire thing but in the end he says that "blaston proved that warriors' damage is the same as in retail"
Garodar Posted June 29, 2016 Author Posted June 29, 2016 This is not even bugged. I updated the calculations with the correct format and it seems legit. I already sent the devs notification to close it but no response, apparently.
Machmollox Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 Its resilience problem, its why strong classes looks like buffed.
Firego Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 Its resilience problem, its why strong classes looks like buffed. No its not. Something else and no1 so far has fihured it out.
Garodar Posted June 29, 2016 Author Posted June 29, 2016 Its resilience problem, its why strong classes looks like buffed. Definitly not resilience.
Voreli Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 lazy to translate the entire thing but in the end he says that "blaston proved that warriors' damage is the same as in retail" I'm sorry, but if you watch the Blizzcon 2014 finals with Zunni playing warrior, you can easily tell that Warriors didn't do nearly as much damage as they do on Panda. Obviously you can hit hard with cooldowns, but when you're just mashing Slam with no procs or anything, you shouldn't be doing 90ks+. Everyone on this server(except warriors) knows how broken they are and how much they counter every other class on this server. That's just a hard fact, there's no denying that. They're too tanky, they do too much damage, and they have no downtime whatsoever. But who is denying this? Warriors. Just like BM hunters *cough* Hatchet *cough* says: "Look at Changelog, BM hunters are working just as they were on retail." B*tch plz
Drink Positive Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 I'm sorry, but if you watch the Blizzcon 2014 finals with Zunni playing warrior, you can easily tell that Warriors didn't do nearly as much damage as they do on Panda. Obviously you can hit hard with cooldowns, but when you're just mashing Slam with no procs or anything, you shouldn't be doing 90ks+. Everyone on this server(except warriors) knows how broken they are and how much they counter every other class on this server. That's just a hard fact, there's no denying that. They're too tanky, they do too much damage, and they have no downtime whatsoever. But who is denying this? Warriors. Just like BM hunters *cough* Hatchet *cough* says: "Look at Changelog, BM hunters are working just as they were on retail." B*tch plz Warriors will awlays be "balanced" here, they will never fix them.
alhinaxd Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 dude, did u see that series? if you actually did u can see that the warriors werent doing that much dmg because they were getting perma slowed/cc'd/root but almost everytime they connected more than 5 seconds they forced a cooldown so i dont think u can prove shit with that and btw it was semi finals not finals
Garodar Posted June 30, 2016 Author Posted June 30, 2016 dude, did u see that series? if you actually did u can see that the warriors werent doing that much dmg because they were getting perma slowed/cc'd/root but almost everytime they connected more than 5 seconds they forced a cooldown so i dont think u can prove shit with that and btw it was semi finals not finals Check the regionals 2014. Push push vs bleached bones. Warriors had uptime for a long time both on warlock and the boomkin and his max hit he got there was 78k. U can even see it when they lose the 1st match, they showed the statiscits.
Adlairo Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 Werent finals lazer vs soda ? No idea tho Talby Nolifer Zunni (God Comp) vs Lazer Laguna Loony (LSD2)
Noneedholy Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 Imagine dks on retail were like on panda Ahhhh tsg vs tsg
Señorpujo Posted August 1, 2016 Posted August 1, 2016 so what happens here? its formula wrong or not?
Garodar Posted August 1, 2016 Author Posted August 1, 2016 Eh, its correct. I think the gear scaling is wrong. Idk how to check it. I dont have any pride geared warr.
Recommended Posts