Repitchx Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 (edited) I know achievements in general are completely bugged What's wrong: Achievements / Statistics Issue: * Statistics are bugged. Your 2s rating is displayed as 3s & 5s rating * If you get 2.7k rating in 2s, you get [Three's Company: 2700] achievements (it should only be able to get it from 3s) * When a GM adds the 'Gladiator' title to your character, you don't get the Gladiator achievement What should happen: * Your 2s rating should not show up as your 3s/5s rating. Your actual 3s rating should show up * Should not get [Three's Company: 2700] if you get 2.7k in 2s. You would need to get 2.7k in 3s * Should get the achievement soon as you get the title Realm: x100/fun Priority: 3/10 Edited January 30, 2017 by Repitchx Link to comment
Garodar Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Shhh, let me get 2700 in 2s first, then put that in your report. Oh, I can't get 2700, cuz I suck. :p :sad: Link to comment
Jonte Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Too late to even bother fixing? (Unless they can remove the [Three's Company: 2700] from people who didn't get it from 3s.) Link to comment
Repitchx Posted November 13, 2016 Author Share Posted November 13, 2016 Too late to even bother fixing? (Unless they can remove the [Three's Company: 2700] from people who didn't get it from 3s.) a bug is a bug. not too late. Link to comment
Noneedholy Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 It would be nice to remove the 2.7 acm from all who didnt get it in 3s. Link to comment
Garodar Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 I got 2.7, now u can remove it. http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/bybee/imgs/9/9/991ee83e.png Link to comment
Developers Heisenberg Posted January 31, 2017 Developers Share Posted January 31, 2017 Yeah i fixed it But, in order to see changes u have to get highest rating than u have before. Because statistics remember only highest value. For example: if u have 1700 in 2x2, 3x3 and 5x5 then u have to get > 1700 in 5x5 to see changes Link to comment
markzxy3 Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 i dont really understand .. is it fixed now so we see our highest rating ? And what about the 2.7 acm's ? Will it get removed from, the player which werent 2.7 in 3s ? I hope so Link to comment
Liquidcityx Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 i didnt understand it too, do you get 2700 achievment now only when you got 2700 in 3s ? Link to comment
Game Masters Jegerm Posted January 31, 2017 Game Masters Share Posted January 31, 2017 i dont really understand .. is it fixed now so we see our highest rating ? And what about the 2.7 acm's ? Will it get removed from, the player which werent 2.7 in 3s ? I hope so To see your highest rating per bracket Zeox need to remove the 2.7 achievements from all players but I am not sure if that will happen. i didnt understand it too, do you get 2700 achievment now only when you got 2700 in 3s ? Yes this is how it supposed to work. From now on after this fix characters who haven't the 2.7k achievment will earn it only if they reach at 2.7k current rating at 3v3. "Earn a 2700 personal rating in the 3v3 bracket of the arena." Link to comment
Repitchx Posted January 31, 2017 Author Share Posted January 31, 2017 To see your highest rating per bracket Zeox need to remove the 2.7 achievements from all players but I am not sure if that will happen. Yes this is how it supposed to work. From now on after this fix characters who haven't the 2.7k achievment will earn it only if they reach at 2.7k current rating at 3v3. "Earn a 2700 personal rating in the 3v3 bracket of the arena." no, he didnt fix the achievement yet. he fixed only the statistics. i told him to fix him, maybe he will do it later. hope so at least. he is a good guy Link to comment
Game Masters Jegerm Posted January 31, 2017 Game Masters Share Posted January 31, 2017 no, he didnt fix the achievement yet. he fixed only the statistics. i told him to fix him, maybe he will do it later. hope so at least. he is a good guy My bad then Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now