Repitchx Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 (edited) Spell: http://db.pandawow.me/?spell=108415 & http://db.pandawow.me/?spell=605 Issue: When you use http://db.pandawow.me/?spell=605 on the Warlock, it doesn't remove Soul Link What should happen: Should remove it. To reactivate Soul Link, you would have to resummon your pet [spoiler=Proof:] "With Mind Control a new pet has to be summoned." - https://eu.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/12206610660?page=2 "At first I thought this was gonna be about how it removed soul link from locks" - https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/17260507309 Can we please fix the bug where after a Dominate Mind, I can't see the CD on my pet's Spell Lock? If I remember correctly, I can't even use its Spell Lock until I resummon it as well. - https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/12405420446 read more of it here: https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/14610681432 Listen to the commentator: "hello everybody! this is a bug or normal? if its a bug gonna be fixed? when i got mind control by priests, command demon doesn't work and soul link doesn't work aswell.. this force me to summon another pet in middle of arena with pet alive, while im dying 20% faster.. please answer" - https://eu.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/9938423769 Realm: x100/fun Priority: You guys asked Conversion to do double tick, well, that was a retail bug and so was this. 10/10, important for priests People want retail bugs and here we go. Enjoy! :) :) :) :) :) :) Edited December 11, 2016 by Repitchx 1
Softice Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 Pretty much retards asked for this. Meaning, we can report ANY bugs that were in passed through MoP expansion till 5.4.8 and got fixed from next exp. Gj, fucking retards.
Repitchx Posted December 11, 2016 Author Posted December 11, 2016 Pretty much retards asked for this. pretty much yeah, but ill leave it up to zeox/heisenberg. they say they want to be blizzlike, i dont want to apply retail bugs (even tho i reported this), but i know pujo and his jaja team. they will find a way to convince zeox to "bug" conversion to do the double tick. if they want to apply 1 retail bug to make it blizzlike, well, then they should apply all. theres a reason i guess they havent declined the conversion bug, right? neff looked through my list and he plays dk, nothing declined. lets just see what happens tbh let the drama begin :o
Softice Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 let the drama begin :o It's incredible how people goddamn thinks that "Blizzlike" is what it literally stands for, jesus fucking christ. Blizzlike means - Blizzard made ( No BUGS A.K.A NO PUJOS ) And since this is private server with its own modification privilege. Pandawow decides if they want to have blizzlike but with better content ;) Fucking disgusted.
Repitchx Posted December 11, 2016 Author Posted December 11, 2016 It's incredible how people goddamn thinks that "Blizzlike" is what it literally stands for, jesus fucking christ. Blizzlike means - Blizzard made ( No BUGS A.K.A NO PUJOS ) And since this is private server with its own modification privilege. Pandawow decides if they want to have blizzlike but with better content ;) Fucking disgusted. let them decide.
Softice Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 let them decide. Make it blizzlike. But without dragging the bugs from retail. If that's how its gonna be, I'm gonna go on ownedcore and drag some bugs here. PUJUSTICE
Repitchx Posted December 11, 2016 Author Posted December 11, 2016 Make it blizzlike. But without dragging the bugs from retail. If that's how its gonna be, I'm gonna go on ownedcore and drag some bugs here. PUJUSTICE LOL do it, it will make them realize tbh
Autschbatsch Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 (edited) I guess the only retail bug which was discussed a lot was Conversion no? Or are there fixed and applied "retail-bugs"? - - - Updated - - - Anyhow I had a longer text here but the site struggles for me atm. TLDR, if this gets high prio and they fuck up the complexity of the spell itself I would L-O-L. Edited December 11, 2016 by Autschbatsch
faina Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 they cant fix dominate mind for X years, no point in asking for this much important bug in lock vs priest is stopping gates which doesnt work in here just b/c you dont see enemy while they fly in gates, nvw they wont fix this also
Repitchx Posted December 11, 2016 Author Posted December 11, 2016 they cant fix dominate mind for X years, no point in asking for this much important bug in lock vs priest is stopping gates which doesnt work in here just b/c you dont see enemy while they fly in gates, nvw they wont fix this also http://forum.pandawow.ru/showthread.php?t=200916 read msgs from heisenberg
Autschbatsch Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 We got our answer here : http://forum.pandawow.ru/showthread.php?t=197670 Retail bugs will not get accepted.
gottena Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 We got our answer here : http://forum.pandawow.ru/showthread.php?t=197670 Retail bugs will not get accepted. yeah but the !conversion maccro isnt comparable to MC removing soul link .. there is no downside removing soul link with MC its just broken , the maccro !conversion instead has a price for a reward, ( even holinka ) said it, would be dumb to compare those 2 " bug"
Softice Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 yeah but the !conversion maccro isnt comparable to MC removing soul link .. there is no downside removing soul link with MC its just broken , the maccro !conversion instead has a price for a reward, ( even holinka ) said it, would be dumb to compare those 2 " bug" Both are bugs, game breaking. What's not comparable?
Autschbatsch Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 (edited) even holinka ) said it Yea that guy had an IQ of at least 145 and achieved 2900CR on multiple classes, I am sure he can tell. Not saying that conversion was broken but holinka is a* complete retard. Edited December 13, 2016 by Autschbatsch
gottena Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 im not saying holinksa is the balance god, im saying even that guy notices that the !conversion maccro was not just a BROKEN bug, it would be like that if it doesnt cost double the runic power, or if he doesnt trigger a gcd when you press it, im saying holinka and gm's realised it had a price for a reward and thats why they left the bug intact UNTIL stupid broken thing happend like in WOD where frost DK were immortal cauz of the maccro, but in mop i was fine, dk's had a just a bonus tool to work with
Autschbatsch Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 Yeye ik, it's just funny how zeox always declines my reports xD ...
Adlairo Posted December 25, 2016 Posted December 25, 2016 (edited) "let the drama begin" im sorry but are you actually trying to ruin my class? You do know that a priest abusing this bug got a warlock sent home from regionals? You shouldnt report this, this bug is so fucking retardedly broken you have no idea "10/10. Important for priests" So basically its really important that Priests can exploit a fucking insanely retarded bug? Sure when Warlocks have a little advantageous bug it must be instantly fixed, but when Priests DONT have one, might aswell grant them one of the most retarded bugs in the game? We cant even banish Psyfiends, and now you want us to have an insane disadvantage vs another priest talent Listen, if you want balance, you wont achieve it by giving some classes retarded bugs because it was the same on retail. Its not Blizzlike because it was a bug. Anyway, to get balance you shouldnt give some classes idiotic bugs for advantages over already OP classes. You want to fix both classes. You are doing it wrong, and now you look biased as fuck. In case u are biased, never report another bug again Edited December 25, 2016 by Adlairo
Noneedholy Posted December 25, 2016 Posted December 25, 2016 yeah but the !conversion maccro isnt comparable to MC removing soul link .. there is no downside removing soul link with MC its just broken , the maccro !conversion instead has a price for a reward, ( even holinka ) said it, would be dumb to compare those 2 " bug" Either none or all retail bugs so gtfo with ur dumb conversion exploit macro Noone cares about ur shitty broken class anyways
Repitchx Posted December 26, 2016 Author Posted December 26, 2016 "let the drama begin" im sorry but are you actually trying to ruin my class? You do know that a priest abusing this bug got a warlock sent home from regionals? You shouldnt report this, this bug is so fucking retardedly broken you have no idea "10/10. Important for priests" So basically its really important that Priests can exploit a fucking insanely retarded bug? Sure when Warlocks have a little advantageous bug it must be instantly fixed, but when Priests DONT have one, might aswell grant them one of the most retarded bugs in the game? We cant even banish Psyfiends, and now you want us to have an insane disadvantage vs another priest talent Listen, if you want balance, you wont achieve it by giving some classes retarded bugs because it was the same on retail. Its not Blizzlike because it was a bug. Anyway, to get balance you shouldnt give some classes idiotic bugs for advantages over already OP classes. You want to fix both classes. You are doing it wrong, and now you look biased as fuck. In case u are biased, never report another bug again i understand. will just repeat what noneed said Either none or all retail bugs so gtfo
Señorpujo Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Both are bugs, game breaking. What's not comparable? x2 healing, but x2 cost, i don't see the bug there, consumes the resources x2 faster so at the end is the same no? while soul link is fucked up
Noneedholy Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 x2 healing, but x2 cost, i don't see the bug there, consumes the resources x2 faster so at the end is the same no? while soul link is fucked up Ah nice, so Pyroblast should cost 10x more mana or requires 6 crit proccs. But then it oneshots you :) Wheres the problem :) ? Renew requires 5x more mana but it simyply 0-100% you in 5 ticks only! Stfu, your logic is beyond retarded
Señorpujo Posted December 27, 2016 Posted December 27, 2016 Ah nice, so Pyroblast should cost 10x more mana or requires 6 crit proccs. But then it oneshots you :) Wheres the problem :) ? Renew requires 5x more mana but it simyply 0-100% you in 5 ticks only! Stfu, your logic is beyond retarded where are the macros of what are u saying? cuz as i know there aren't
Administrators Zeox Posted January 4, 2017 Administrators Posted January 4, 2017 We won't apply even blizzlike bugs such this one or conversion. Declined. All should work in the correct way, how blizzards want, if blizzard has bug - we will fix it lol. 3
Recommended Posts