Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Corruption ticks has a 10% chance to make a soul shard, should Corruption ticks made by Malefic grasp too? (atm it doesn't in pwow + it doesn't heal with Siphon Life gliph) Edited by Leffap
Posted
  Garodar said:
No...

 

but as i remember there was a report that saying that malefic grasp corruption ticks should heal the 0,5% hp with the gliph

Posted (edited)
  Garodar said:
Malefic Grasp corruption ticks aren't "Corruption", so no...

 

they are counted as corruption dmg:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNvJsQusqKs

 

As u can see, its counted as Corruption dmg when malefic grasp does dmg, so this dmg also should active the Siphon heal and have the 10% chance to get soul shards too.

Edited by Leffap
Posted (edited)
  Garodar said:
Malefic Grasp corruption ticks aren't "Corruption", so no...

 

  Leffap said:
they are counted as corruption dmg:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNvJsQusqKs

 

As u can see, its counted as Corruption dmg when malefic grasp does dmg, so this dmg also should active the Siphon heal and have the 10% chance to get soul shards too.

 

konichiwa

Edited by Leffap
Posted
  Stayfjurt said:
find a proof on some retail forums , just google it , when u find something you are going to have real proof and then they can fix it.

 

I love your Il'gynoth quote dude. You deserve a virtual hug.

Posted

Find a proof , do a propper report at bug tracker and heisenberg will fix it. Im really amazed about this if its true it will boost my affli dps af

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Just dig some videos on google or some old wow threads

Posted
  Stayfjurt said:
Find a proof , do a propper report at bug tracker and heisenberg will fix it. Im really amazed about this if its true it will boost my affli dps af

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Just dig some videos on google or some old wow threads

 

isn't enough proving that its still counted as "corruption" dmg? :/

Posted
apparently not, smart guy. Burden of proof is on you, so you gotta go to extreme lengths to prove your assertion. So either do as Stayfjurt says or shut up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 48 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...