Garodar

Worked for my wrathguard, not sure about other lock pets..

Might I ask how is the progress doing? I mean, how many bugs were fixed and how many are still intending to be fixed? Did you sort out the fixed from not fixed bugs on your list and if so, can we see what is still to be fixed... like a small update? :)

#fixed Not sure for how long, haven't faced hunters in ages.

Nice taste bro. I'd always go with WSG and Tol'viron. :heart:

That's not the point and never was. If it was 70%, u could do 6 coils and still not get proc. Its just luck and it was fixed. Besides, u can't even know what % is it working on currently, so there's no point for this report.

Then it would be too much like Nagrand. 4 pillars, middle of map, corners, only alot bigger version. Tbh, I like the Tol'viron arena the way it is. @Noneedholy so the legends are true. You did que for bg more than once in your life. :p

If its most balanced, it doesn't automatically have to be my favorite. I play not so op comp and I like Blade's edge because I'm demo warlock. More kiting for me I guess...

Well, I'm a lock, so feel for me when its Blade's edge. Plus, why would it be hard for rogue to kite on Blade's edge anyway?

Oh... ok then... die and become a death knight.

Kill yourself. :p http://b.thumbs.redditmedia.com/sDlwStUip26TpzA6Rc21JlwM8t8awlQsbWO7qlCRtdg.png

Bump this is just starting to get annoying now.

No. Wasn't fixed and never will be fixed. Bugs like this and "Role bug" where everyone is considered healer will not be fixed.

Ye, last battleground added in the game in the last 3 years. :p

So, you do agree that your partners are... I'm gonna say 'lazy' because if you are doing 10 times more work than they are, lazy is the best way to put it. Take no offense in regards to your team or your partners, I'm just asking :p

What's up ya'll. Let me make a quick nondrama topic here. Basically, I'm doing a little survey on WoW's top battlegrounds and arenas and I'm using these strawpoll's to gather all the votes. Now, I'm making the topic here because of its large community so I think this is where it'll get the most votes. :) Vote here: Favorite Battleground: http://www.strawpoll.me/10678266 Favorite Arena: http://www.strawpoll.me/10678284 Remember, you can always say why you think 1 bg/arena is above the others and be objective when it comes to that. Explain why X bg or X arena is your favorite. :D

Can you make this become a "match history" on site, so us too, the community can check if people are wintrading. :)

Roflmao. :p

ye, good point. i'd agree with that.

Well, doesn't neccessarily have to be low req, just make titles harder to get in 2s than 3s.

Wrong section. :confused:

That isn't what I meant... /facepalm EDIT: What I meant: If you get 2800 in 2's, you're determined to get duelist. If you get 2600, you're set for a challenger. They shouldn't give out titles by place, shouldn't be r1, r36. Should be rating req.

Bump or I vote Trump! :p

Wrong idea. Keep titles for 2s, but make titles in 3's more available. Make rating requirements, not place/number requirements as it is now. This what I'm gonna say is just an example, not a real opinion: Let say 2v2: R1 req would be 3k. Glad range would be 2.9k. Duelist 2.8k. Rival 2.7k. Challenger 2.6k In 3v3 'tho. Make Rating requirement alot lower, almost twice as lower. That way, players would feel 3v3 is easier to get titles in because it is less inflated, lower rating requirements and easier titles. Then the bracket would get more inflated and populated. This however is just me talking. Feel free to disagree. :)

I did not understand the word he said here. The english is just beyond me... :confused:

definitly. :p