Jump to content

Rain of Fire ticks

Furmetal

By Furmetal
in Declined topics

Recommended Posts

Nemifest Collaborator

Nemifest

Posted
Posted
.....

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Is the only argument based in something on all this topic.

 

Now u are alowed to shut up http://z0r.de/3068

 

 

Aftermath has nothing to do with RoF stacking.

 

Aftermath only allows you to just cast it while casting something else, it's called Multitask, obviously you didn't know that.

 

Now, prove us something or be allowed to Q_Q

pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted

You all are the ones who have to proof where says that rain should work how u mean, u just used comends from players on a forum, that means nothing.

In the spells description from Wowhead don't say anything about what u are talking about, so this post have no fundament. Thats all.

 

Your lack of proofs make all your arguments totally kid arguments, just rage comments trying to change a mechanic of the game.

 

http://z0r.de/3068

 

 

 

Iniciado por pujo2

http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire , http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath

 

I don't see anywhere "official info" saying that works how u mean.. even more, your argument of how it should work is based in a comment from a random guy in a forum.. Rain of Fire is thought to work like that because Destruction warlock have this pasive Aftermath which alow destro warlock to do that, to hit with more than 1 rain to 1 target because there is no need to cast it, ur argument just does not hold, its just how u want it to work, not how it work..

 

Search for official blizzard message saying the mechanic u explain, not a discussion in a forum made by players..

pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
You made the post, proof your explanation of the mechanic, if u don't, then the post should be Declined, thats all. Edited by pujo2
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted
We already proved our Formula, now prove your formula.

 

This thread will NOT be declined.

 

And it will be fixed.

 

Random player opinions in a forum is not a proof..

 

If i go on oficial forum and say that warriors should do 400k then u will post it here saying that warrior should hit 400k?? NO' date=' its just stupid, blizzard have to say it, not the players opinion..[/quote']
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
We already proved our Formula, now prove your formula.

 

This thread will NOT be declined.

 

And it will be fixed.

 

Random player opinions in a forum is not a proof..

 

If i go on oficial forum and say that warriors should do 400k then u will post it here saying that warrior should hit 400k?? NO' date=' its just stupid, blizzard have to say it, not the players opinion..[/quote']

 

http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire, http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath

 

I don't see anywhere "official info" saying that works how u mean.. even more, your argument of how it should work is based in a comment from a random guy in a forum.. Rain of Fire is thought to work like that because Destruction warlock have this pasive http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=109784/aftermath which alow destro warlock to do that, to hit with more than 1 rain to 1 target because there is no need to cast it, ur argument just does not hold, its just how u want it to work, not how it work..

 

Search for official blizzard message saying the mechanic u explain, not a discussion in a forum made by players..

 

plus: About rain: Changes on time period from 15.07.15 tо 31.07.15 --> http://forum.pandawow.ru/showthread.php?t=122468&page=2

Edited by pujo2
Furmetal Wanderer

Furmetal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Pujo2, please, if you don't have any relevant information, please post nothing(if you don't break any rules, I'll not delete your post, I'm giving you an advice regarding your own image).

 

If the bug report is wrong, the administrators will simply not implement, they know what they are doing.

 

I was able to use my computer again 5 minutes ago and when I came to this thread, everything you said(since I read it all at once) was, literally, the same thing. Please stop flooding my thread, your arguing changes nothing here(except for spamming and people's dislike towards eachother).

 

Also, you are not posting any coherent/legitimate information regarding the subject.

 

Thread name changed, I accidentally typed "Rain of Fire Damage" while what is wrong with it is its ticks.

Edited by Furmetal
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
I was able to use my computer again 5 minutes ago and when I came to this thread' date=' everything you said(since I read it all at once) was, literally, the same thing. Please stop flooding my thread[/quote']

 

I just answer with the same when someone repeat the same arguments without any proof.

 

I wrote in this topic just to say that this suposed "mechanic" don't appear anywhere, the post is based in a player comment on a forum topic, what is not a proof, bug reports require Wowhead link of the spell and in the description have to be clear what is going wrong, proof of the posible bug, or in some blizzard info. Then in the case with no evidence on the problem that is reported on the topic, just then people should shut up and stop making 12 years old comments.

 

Sorry for the flood with same text but people comments use to be so mad. --->

pujo2, You so noob, lol.
comments like that
Edited by pujo2
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
Pujo. Our proof has already been given, if you disagree. Prove us wrong

 

What proof? I still didn't saw any proof, just a player opinion in a forum saying how he think should work.

Edited by pujo2
Saylance Rookie

Saylance

Posted
Posted
saying how he think should work.

We dont think, we know how it works.

 

Sorry for the flood with same text but people comments use to be so mad.

Your stupidness make you mad.

  • Like 2
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
We dont think, we know how it works.

 

 

Your stupidness make you mad.

 

 

Oh, you "know"? proof that this is how should work, where says it.. i can also say that i know how somethng should work, for example war should do 400k critics all time, because i know it.

Edited by pujo2
zyrah Newcomer

zyrah

Posted
Posted
What proof? I still didn't saw any proof, just a player opinion in a forum saying how he think should work.

 

didn't see *

Man , you are the most stupid person on this server , you are just spamming the same shit over and over again , " 12 year old kids , random player forums " ,etc.

Idk if you are blind or what , THE PROOF is there , you are just trying to defend your bugs , as always , now gtfo please and stop the spam , this will be fix BECAUSE IS A BUG ( even if you denie it , because you like to abuse of everything you can , lol )

pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/10949905137 The argue of the report is a comment of a guy in a forum saying how he think it have to work..

 

No where says all that u are asking to change. Its just how what u want it to work, thats all. Stop making stupid comments..

 

 

Mad 12 years old comments:

Man ' date=' you are the most stupid person on this server[/quote'] ,
this will be fix BECAUSE IS A BUG
no proofs that this should not work like that, just talk and talk.

 

Its sad to see that alot of people here make kid comments all time, insulting and just talking, all based in a player opinion on a forum, not in spells descriptions or in oficial info..

 

The problem on this topic is that no one proff why this should not work like that..

Edited by pujo2
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
Proof: http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire#comments comments section, 1st comment in Green.

 

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/6758986263 - official retail forum discussion about how Rain of Fire works.

 

Player points of view again.. 0 proofs of how it should work.

 

http://forum.pandawow.ru/showthread.php?t=156426&p=965623#post965623 this is a post with proffs, not what u are doing here..

 

Spells description, or any blizzard oficial info, not players comments in a discussion.. as i said, is just how some random players want it to work.

 

Rules: How to report a bug.

Topic name must contain a clear description of the problem. If it's about not working spells/quests/npcs, then the topic name must contain the name of the spell/quest/npc. If this bug that you describe doesn't apply to the aforementioned groups, the name of this topic should clearly describe the problem.

 

Wrong examples: "fix it!", "i wanna tell you about it", "bug, can you solve the problem?".

 

1. Name of not working spell/quest/npc etc Necessarily add a link to WoWHead

2. Description of the problem. Try to explain all as best as you can. Describe what is not working exactly. Add proofs of your words - usually attached screenshot or the combat log - is enough.

3.How it must work. Necessarily give examples with the link to WoWHead, WoWWiki or WoWPedia. You can use any evidence, the main thing that it isn't your opinion, but official data from the official server WoW.

4.Date when you tested it.

5.Realm (x100/x5/Fun), on which you have found the bug.

6.Priority of the problem. (1-10) It doesn't mean that if you will write 10, then developers will work on it in the first place. In the sum, we are creating our own priorities.

 

Seems that even some GM's don't know the rules of a bug report..

 

http://wow.gamepedia.com/Rain_of_Fire

http://wowwiki.wikia.com/wiki/Rain_of_Fire

http://www.db.pandawow.me?spell=5740/rain-of-fire

 

I don't see anywhere what u are asking for in the mechanic.

 

I ask for closing the topic because is still with no proffs and because is becoming a bucle of insults and spam.

Edited by pujo2
pujo2 Rookie

pujo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
OP posted video proof, what I posted further confirms his proof. Simple logic too much of a stretch for you or what?

 

The video just show how Rain of Fire work..is not a proff of how u think the mechanic have to be.. seems that u didn't read http://forum.pandawow.ru/showthread.php?t=46796 ...

 

3.How it must work. Necessarily give examples with the link to WoWHead, WoWWiki or WoWPedia. You can use any evidence, the main thing that it isn't your opinion, but official data from the official server WoW.

 

the main thing that it isn't your opinion, but official data from the official server WoW.

 

Your opinion of how it should work or the other players opinion in comments on a forum discussion is not a proff... is what im saying all time.

 

Seems that u don't understand.. close the topic because is not going anywhere..

Edited by pujo2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...