Jegerm

Thank you for the brilliant feedback. Instead of sitting and waiting when solo queue will be turned into an inactive bracket like 3s for example we decided to give rewards to the top 20 players of the bracket. I assume, that you prefer to not issue rewards to anyone so the potential winners can buy with their own money, characters, mounts etc. So in few words, increase the queue length by a lot since as you said yourself the majority is already 550 item leveled and let 6 non 550 item leveled players wait probably forever until a queue pops. I doubt that there are at all times, 6 under geared players who want to join for 3s solo queue. No one argues about that. Today, I left for the first time in my Pandawow career the moderation of chat and issued bans to one person who was inside an arena with an alt account and another one who literally did nothing for several games. As you can imagine, we are not online 24/7 so it is literally impossible to spectate every single game, this is why we truly appreciate players help with reporting others with proofs and not writting in game complaints especially when we are not online that someone "is trolling inside arena" or accusing a player with literally zero evidences. I am confident that no one wants to get punished without proofs because some other players accuse him/her. This is actually a good suggestion. I will forward it myself to the administration for discussion and we will let you know about it. This is why it is called solo queue because literally you have no clue before the arena game start with whom you will play with. If you do not want to take that risk you can always queue yourself for normal 3v3 but some other people as it is clearly visible in game at the moment prefer instead of waiting maybe 30 minutes to get a 3v3 queue and spam 20 times in world channel to someone queue for 3v3 arena to "risk" and queue for solo queue, this is totally up to players. Also keep in mind that, the match making system at low rating is trying to find which combos are the most appropriate for your class/spec. If there are a lot of queues and some players who are decent and will climb the ladder after few weeks or a month will have higher rating than others so in theory as more rating your character has it will be less possible to be in the same team with an inexperienced player. Conclusion, at this point we do not want to forbid low item leveled players to queue for 3s solo because it is literally the only possible way to gear up. By blocking them we literally forbid new players to come play on our server or old players to create new characters and gear them up. We can not force them to play 100 random BGs collect conquest points, increase their item level and then have the opportunity to queue for 3s solo. Moreover with that logic, you may have on your first arena game a low item leveled player and in the second or third game the low leveled player will be at the opponent team or if they are that many probably both teams will have low geared players. Locked & sent for discussion for suggestion No 3.

Hello, no one disagrees that rated BGs are inactive and pretty much it is impossible to get those titles at the moment but on the other hand we can not give them "for free" so everyone could have such unique titles. I will discuss this matter with our developers. At this point, I am thinking more like to make those titles available via PvP quests, for example we can create a quest which will require 100 random BGs win to receive "X title" in specific time (e.g. 1 month) or maybe 20 random BG wins in row (without losing for 20 BGs) and receive title "Z". Once again, all the numbers I wrote above are just examples. We have to discuss about it and see what will be the most appropriate and fair solution for everyone. At this point, the new x1 realm is coming so our developers are focused on it so most likely if we will make a decision about this matter, we will start working after the realease of the new realm. I am locking the topic for now but if at some point in the future, I have news about it I will make a post on the topic and let you know. Locked.

Hello, by simply logging in or doing PvP/PvE activities you can earn silver coins and purchase yourself, pretty much for free the service you wish or even other transmogrification items or mounts. For more informations you can check here: Declined.

Already done. Locked.

Already answered here: When and if there will be a decision to start working on new mounts, we will consider adding the mounts you requested. Locked.

Hello, since the realease of the new realm is on the way, developers are focused on it. They said that, we will probably realease mounts from newer expansions after the realease of the new x1. Locked.

Pretty much for the same reason, I wrote on your other topic. Declined.

We prefer to keep it that way because the majority of players at xfun are already full geared and we want to keep our arenas as active as possible. The players that way, have a motivation to queue more times for arenas to obtain the visual enchants as well as make them more unique because only few people can purchase them. Declined.

I have already muted him, the next insult from an alt account will count as harassment and the violator will receive an account ban. Please keep reporting the player if he insult you again.

Hello, it depends what type of game play you prefer. If you are more into PvP and you do not want to spend your time on leveling up and collect gear, the xfun realm is the one you should choose. If on the other hand, you like PvE, leveling, questing etc. you should choose the x100 realm.

So, a while ago back at 2022 I used to host some server events (PvP 2v2,1v1, hide and seek etc) and sadly there wasn't many players who wanted to participate in the events. Maybe it was because of the language barrier (I made announcements at egnlish language because obviously I am not russian) or maybe because people hesitated to participate because most of the tickets I received back then was to summon them to watch the event and not participate on it. Somehow we managed to have more viewers than participants Anyway, after a while I stopped helding events because the participation was low. I even made some announcements back then at discord and forum e.g. Conclusion, I hosted back then dozens of events (more that I wrote on the forum topic & discord) but it did not go very well. It's not part of administrators or GMs job to be visible in game or talk in the world chat so you can confirm that they are online. We are online every single day and I can also confirm that the staff members do play in all realms and we probably at some point we were together on a battleground group or in a raid but for obvious reasons our characters are not known to the community. Now on topic, I am locking the thread because the suggestion already got rejected by the administration and it is well known in our socials that a brand new x1 realm is comming at 2025. More informations about it, will be published by administrators later. Rejected.

Please check my reply in the thread you created at the private subforum. Locked.

Banned, 3d.

He doesn't have a clue of what he is talking about, ignore that message. You already created a topic at the proper section, please wait for Locative's reply there. Locked.

We need more proofs than this, maybe they got gripped by a DK or a friendly priest leaped them on graveyard. Declined.

Same IP. Banned, 30d. Items, currencies and rating which were earned unfairly got also removed.

Due to some complaints we received, from now on we need to see evidences from at least two different battlegrounds that the player is afking so we can issue a punishment. It's necessary to prove a pattern. Declined.

1st video proof -- 13.484.048 damage dealt 2nd video proof -- 5.750.093 damage dealt (Also, second in the scoreboard ladder) 3rd video proof -- 1.148.413 damage dealt at 1:04 of video proof and the player leaves the battleground at 1:58 of the video. 4th video proof -- 4.180.047 damage dealt How this player does 0 damage while we can see in scoreboard that in every BG he has dealt million of damages to the opponent team and even helped in 3 of the BGs that you reported him with claiming bases/flags, even though the majority of players on the scoreboard as we can see did not help at all. We do not ban players for not playing properly according to you inside BGs, I mean claiming bases, defend etc. We can only issue bans to players who intentionally not fighting in BGs or afking and in our case this did not happen because player Laylazx dealt millions of damage to his opponents and as well as did not notice him afking because every time you approached him and hitting him he was either trying to kite or hit you or your team mates back. Declined.

Due to some complaints we had we decided that in order to issue a ban to a player for intentionally not fighting in BGs, afking, we need to see evidences from at least 2 different BGs so we can make sure that that there is a pattern. (Continuously afking) On this case, I recorded myself player Psychogirl and I confirmed that he was afking in at least 2 different BGs. So for future reports, please make sure to get proofs from at least 2 different battlegrounds so we can issue the punishment. Banned, 3d.

Banned, 3d.

Banned, 30d. This specific player has several offences in his ban history (including alt accounts) for afking inside BGs.

Banned, 3d.

Здравствуйте, пожалуйста прочтите.

您好，您可以用铭文制作它，也可以通过动作屋获得它。

There is a difference to suggest to administration to deactivate the PvP from making as default to have the PvP mode off, those are two completely different things. My reply to the author of that topic was about his suggestion to deactivate PvP. Keep in mind that, x100 realm is a PvP realm, at least in theory. So my reply was not about the default of the PvP mode but for the deactivation. Locked.